Skip to content
English
  • There are no suggestions because the search field is empty.

What are Development Standards and Conditions of Approval?

Subdivision Review Criteria and Findings Under the Montana Subdivision and Platting Act


The MSPA sets forth criteria for local government review in 76‐3-608, MCA, stating “the basis for the governing body's decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny a proposed subdivision is whether the subdivision application, preliminary plat, applicable environmental assessment, public hearing, planning board recommendations, or additional information demonstrates that development of the proposed subdivision meets the requirements of this
chapter." In conducting its review and coming to a decision, the governing body prepares written findings of fact in support of their decision, based on the evidence provided by the applicant, applicable local, state or federal reviewing agencies, as well as written comments submitted by the public or oral testimony given in a public hearing on the application. These findings should address the primary review criteria set forth in statute, evaluating the subdivision’s impact on agriculture, agricultural water user facilities, local services, the natural environment, wildlife, wildlife habitat, and public health and safety. The governing body will also evaluate and prepare findings that address the proposed subdivision’s compliance with the survey requirements set forth under MSPA; the local subdivision regulations, local review procedure, the provision of easements within and to the proposed subdivision for the location and installation of utilities; and the provision of legal and physical access to each parcel within the proposed subdivision. When reviewing the proposed subdivision and evaluating potential impacts, the governing body may require the subdivision be designed in such a way that will reasonably minimize potential significant impacts identified through 8. Land Use and Planning Law in Montana 192 the course of the review process. Any mitigation required must be justified through written findings of fact that document and support the relationship between the impact resulting from the development and the need for the type, and extent, of mitigation required. Mitigation required should be supported through enforceable conditions of approval, to ensure these requirements have been met prior to approving final plat. The MSPA recognizes that there may be instances where the unmitigable impacts resulting from a proposed development are considered unacceptable, and the governing body may deny proposed subdivision. The governing body must notify the applicant in writing within thirty (30) days of the decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the proposed subdivision, 76-3-608(1), MCA. The statute sets forth an appeals process for parties aggrieved by a decision made by the governing body, 76-3-625, MCA